🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to restart nuclear discussions with the United States on condition that it is handled with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has stated.

The Iranian diplomat declared only diplomacy produced results, and revealed recent overtures had been made by intermediaries to restart discussions with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Iran had not yet reached a point to authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to access struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Navigating a Complex Route

The foreign minister is walking a complex course since Iran wishes not to appear to be operating from a position of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more resilient militarily and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Discussions Suddenly Terminated

The prior phases of negotiations between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that concluded with the US president claiming the sites had been destroyed. Following this, Western states exercised their privilege to reinstate international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Offered

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with US participation could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could operate inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Diplomats asserted three times they had secured an understanding with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Current Position

Iranian officials stated the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be resurrected in some form if negotiations reopen.

The American leader in recent days said he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but in private Iran's diplomats state they are not yet receiving clear proposals from Washington either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been charged of inactivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran asserts dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his speech to the forum, aimed to paint the US as a dominant force that abuses the idea of worldwide standards, Araghchi said the 12-day war demonstrated the dispute could not be ended by combat operations. He stated the attacks began with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with complete American awareness and coordination, making trust challenging to reestablish.

Dialogue Stays the Ultimate Solution

The foreign minister said: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned dialogue; it was America and the western countries that had always tried to impose their will during the talks. Dialogue can still be viable and remains the ultimate solution to address disputes, but its requirements, regulations and principles must be followed."

"Provided that they speak to the nation of Iran with the approach of dignity and honor, they will receive a reply in the equivalent approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of recovery and recovery, Araghchi said he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We acquired numerous insights from this conflict; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He stated: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to obliterate, remains in place. The sites and equipment, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but failed to break. The nation of Iran have developed more resilient, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the administration and the country in the face of this invasion."